How are sentences generally determined for juvenile offenders?

Sentences for juvenile offenders are primarily determined based on the best interests of the child, which include a focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. This approach is rooted in the understanding that juveniles are still in their formative years and capable of change. The juvenile justice system emphasizes the idea that the goal is to provide the necessary support and interventions to help young offenders learn from their mistakes and reintegrate positively into society.

Factors that might influence this determination include the juvenile's age, the nature of the offense, prior offenses, and the recommendations of social workers or psychologists. This holistic consideration aligns with the principles of juvenile justice that prioritize the potential for reform and support over punitive measures.

Other options do not encompass the wider focus on rehabilitation and best interests of the child. While the severity of the crime may play a role in the sentencing process, it is not the sole determining factor. Trials by jury are less common in juvenile cases, as many jurisdictions employ bench trials where a judge makes the decision. Additionally, letting parents decide on sentencing would remove the responsibility from the judicial system and does not reflect the legal framework designed to support juveniles in more constructive ways.