What is a key difference between child welfare cases and juvenile justice cases?

The key difference between child welfare cases and juvenile justice cases lies in the nature of the issues they address. Juvenile justice specifically pertains to cases involving criminal behavior committed by minors. It focuses on the actions of the youth in question and aims to address offenses that fall under criminal law, with an emphasis on accountability and potential rehabilitation within the context of the justice system.

On the other hand, child welfare cases are primarily concerned with the wellbeing of a child, often in situations where neglect or abuse is suspected. These cases strive to ensure that children are safe and provided for, sometimes leading to interventions that do not involve legal proceedings related to criminal behavior.

The other statements do not accurately define the distinction. For instance, while child welfare cases may involve legal custody, this aspect does not differentiate them from juvenile justice cases effectively. Similarly, juvenile justice is not solely focused on educational outcomes, and the idea that child welfare prioritizes punishment over rehabilitation is not aligned with the fundamental goals of child welfare systems, which typically emphasize the child's best interests and protective measures.